Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-05 09:35:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 87DC4BE37B6C20A262D3CECFECCD17938E4D1948498D13705A8053F21303B002
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN L’autore del post ha espresso una sua legittima opinione, criticando sia la sentenza (per cui non ha senso usare come fonte la sentenza criticata) sia la legge sulla legittima difesa. Vanno usati i commenti e non le CN per criticare una diversa opinione.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731962827802280266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 87DC4BE37B6C20A262D3CECFECCD17938E4D1948498D13705A8053F21303B002
  • createdAtMillis - 1701768934850
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173196282780228026687DC4BE37B6C20A262D3CECFECCD17938E4D1948498D13705A8053F21303B002