Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-05 16:47:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E9DB16E51EFFE220DB5852E091049FF42E27B0D7CA41B24D79CFB61862706E2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN L’autore del post ha espresso una sua legittima opinione, criticando sia la sentenza (per cui non ha senso usare come fonte la sentenza criticata) sia la legge sulla legittima difesa. Vanno usati i commenti e non le CN per criticare una diversa opinione.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731962827802280266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E9DB16E51EFFE220DB5852E091049FF42E27B0D7CA41B24D79CFB61862706E2
  • createdAtMillis - 1701794848964
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17319628278022802664E9DB16E51EFFE220DB5852E091049FF42E27B0D7CA41B24D79CFB61862706E2