Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-05 09:11:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CFA74542459036BA8B6ADA66F024EE2E8D1C484B207BED121627573A014E56F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN L’autore del post ha espresso una sua legittima opinione, criticando sia la sentenza (per cui non ha senso usare come fonte la sentenza criticata) sia la legge sulla legittima difesa. Vanno usati i commenti e non le CN per criticare una diversa opinione.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731962827802280266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0CFA74542459036BA8B6ADA66F024EE2E8D1C484B207BED121627573A014E56F
  • createdAtMillis - 1701767490266
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17319628278022802660CFA74542459036BA8B6ADA66F024EE2E8D1C484B207BED121627573A014E56F