Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-05 07:08:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 003B7CADC3482D712FA93ADC14C5722E6371DF45921B43AFE6936BE446DD4CC6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note citing NBC is flawed. It uses the DOJ’s brief in this case as a source. As a party to the case, the brief isn’t an unbiased, objective source, but an argument given for the Court’s consideration. SCOTUS has ultimate say over which cases it decides to hear https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artIII-S2-C2-4/ALDE_00001221/ https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-3/section-2/clause-2/supreme-court-appellate-jurisdiction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731850588332126312
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 003B7CADC3482D712FA93ADC14C5722E6371DF45921B43AFE6936BE446DD4CC6
  • createdAtMillis - 1701760133431
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1731850588332126312003B7CADC3482D712FA93ADC14C5722E6371DF45921B43AFE6936BE446DD4CC6