Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-04 19:52:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 15B0CB4361D3420CC65CC857AF282B46196E663122E8F251201D5268A7283BC7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Collecting analyzing and confirming the remains of semen could've been considered evidence But it wasn’t collected This is why Israel is depending heavily on second hand sharing of “eye witness testimony” It’s the weakest form of evidence https://x.com/propandco/status/1731557148495069609?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1731644020307202073
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 15B0CB4361D3420CC65CC857AF282B46196E663122E8F251201D5268A7283BC7
  • createdAtMillis - 1701719550225
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173164402030720207315B0CB4361D3420CC65CC857AF282B46196E663122E8F251201D5268A7283BC7