Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-04 07:04:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ACC75355BC86053A27B63F05E310A2CB5DE84ABCE561874990E19AD57559AC32
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. “Labeling Digital ID as 'voluntary' can be misleading if it becomes an implicit requirement for essential services” - “if” is the key word. It is currently not a requirement for access to essential services. https://www.biometricupdate.com/202312/australias-digital-id-bill-introduced-with-au145-5m-earmark Community Notes is not for speculation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1730881497060815289
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ACC75355BC86053A27B63F05E310A2CB5DE84ABCE561874990E19AD57559AC32
  • createdAtMillis - 1701673479300
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1730881497060815289ACC75355BC86053A27B63F05E310A2CB5DE84ABCE561874990E19AD57559AC32