Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-29 00:09:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 104597817EA450C1A9098FDEA0B8BBEF6F31DB0D0D4ECD8752B560C664C1DE04
Participant Details

Original Note:

A PL 2121/2019, ao contrário do que insinua o autor, tratava da definição de prazo de julgamento de mérito após concessão de medida cautelar. Ela não impedia que ministros concedessem medidas cautelares, logo, não limitava o poder de decisão monocrática de um ministro. https://www12.senado.leg.br/ecidadania/visualizacaomateria?id=136217

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729285438588735984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 104597817EA450C1A9098FDEA0B8BBEF6F31DB0D0D4ECD8752B560C664C1DE04
  • createdAtMillis - 1701216570492
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1729285438588735984104597817EA450C1A9098FDEA0B8BBEF6F31DB0D0D4ECD8752B560C664C1DE04