Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-27 23:35:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5C606885510728132C5A0B7ECEE5ADDF5B19E77298AFE59DCB86F206BD667EEC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN the proposed notes include articles that doesn’t support the notes ( names of the victims doesn’t match, one of the articles mentions the wrong town)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729281714374009050
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5C606885510728132C5A0B7ECEE5ADDF5B19E77298AFE59DCB86F206BD667EEC
  • createdAtMillis - 1701128107455
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17292817143740090505C606885510728132C5A0B7ECEE5ADDF5B19E77298AFE59DCB86F206BD667EEC