Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-29 00:06:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0ACEC71E7E3F2F0ACB4A59E85D16602008FF0025C4E93B595E516E109F39D293
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN the proposed notes include articles that doesn’t support the notes ( names of the victims doesn’t match, one of the articles mentions the wrong town)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1729281714374009050
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0ACEC71E7E3F2F0ACB4A59E85D16602008FF0025C4E93B595E516E109F39D293
  • createdAtMillis - 1701216383021
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17292817143740090500ACEC71E7E3F2F0ACB4A59E85D16602008FF0025C4E93B595E516E109F39D293