Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-23 15:29:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F7B9245D5ED04894177C669954F4F259CF87CF1FF4F98D33BC22C50EB1D637F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

今回の判決を下したのは広島高裁の脇由紀裁判長であり女性です。https://iraw.rcc.jp/topics/articles/17256

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727689351319187861
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F7B9245D5ED04894177C669954F4F259CF87CF1FF4F98D33BC22C50EB1D637F3
  • createdAtMillis - 1700753351008
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1727689351319187861F7B9245D5ED04894177C669954F4F259CF87CF1FF4F98D33BC22C50EB1D637F3