Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-22 20:58:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FC0E1364B2645B343F375F639C302A5FAC95BB4C04834FBD3DB93BFCA495D186
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Post is opinion based on abductive reasoning. Science requires observable, repeatable results in accordance with scientific method. Impossible with “climate change.” Regardless of consensus, abductive reasoning, in either direction, re: climate change, is valid. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/intro-to-biology/science-of-biology/a/the-science-of-biology https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/deduction-vs-induction-vs-abduction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1727430592071909385
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FC0E1364B2645B343F375F639C302A5FAC95BB4C04834FBD3DB93BFCA495D186
  • createdAtMillis - 1700686686340
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1727430592071909385FC0E1364B2645B343F375F639C302A5FAC95BB4C04834FBD3DB93BFCA495D186