Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-20 04:37:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A88D842B1DA5562C164D055CA885224D96A1259023DDA9E428B4B021B9624F46
Participant Details

Original Note:

The claims made in this tweet are not supported by the study being referenced (see link). The study itself states the tests used were subject to inaccuracies and the results should not be generalized. It states that additional research is needed to validate their findings. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.230743

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1726439316573020478
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A88D842B1DA5562C164D055CA885224D96A1259023DDA9E428B4B021B9624F46
  • createdAtMillis - 1700455028797
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1726439316573020478A88D842B1DA5562C164D055CA885224D96A1259023DDA9E428B4B021B9624F46