Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-19 09:07:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5EFB4821B683785EDBE89995105F53DC2920991F0C655384C36B1097FD0F21A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

El post no necesita contexto por expresar una realidad pero no permitir comentarios para evitar desacuerdos u opiniones contrarias y debate desvirtua la pluralidad e imparcialidad necesarios que un buen comunicador debería promover para que la información no parezca sesgada https://www.comisiondequejas.com/otras-normas-eticas/codigos/codigo-internacional-de-etica-periodistica-unesco/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1726022765856112950
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5EFB4821B683785EDBE89995105F53DC2920991F0C655384C36B1097FD0F21A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1700384870060
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17260227658561129505EFB4821B683785EDBE89995105F53DC2920991F0C655384C36B1097FD0F21A5