Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-14 18:13:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F9E45C3791E50E88F9756FDF6879E54A267ABA2665F3D85ADBE469B5EACC1569
Participant Details

Original Note:

No es una opinión formal del ejecutivo comunitario, cuyos En todo caso, matizan, el texto está siendo analizado ahora en profundidad por servicios jurídicos la están analizando, sino una opinión informal de “fuentes comunitarias” según se señala en el cuerpo de la noticia. https://t.co/e9MgVylHIU

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1724490429607899272
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F9E45C3791E50E88F9756FDF6879E54A267ABA2665F3D85ADBE469B5EACC1569
  • createdAtMillis - 1699985612765
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1724490429607899272F9E45C3791E50E88F9756FDF6879E54A267ABA2665F3D85ADBE469B5EACC1569