Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-31 07:09:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59AFE2BC1CE2E47CB96CE0E41375ACDF216354882BB7AB6D2101B66C372F0EBF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source is the Guardian. That is a reputable source. You don't get to link the article and say "not enough proof for me" that's not how community notes works. You have to actually disprove it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1722776631134110013
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59AFE2BC1CE2E47CB96CE0E41375ACDF216354882BB7AB6D2101B66C372F0EBF
  • createdAtMillis - 1722409748913
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 172277663113411001359AFE2BC1CE2E47CB96CE0E41375ACDF216354882BB7AB6D2101B66C372F0EBF