Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-11-10 14:12:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 32DC91DC05DD36F373A8067999F7D3C838ABFC0D0520E3F354E51BCE977BDF90
Participant Details
Original Note:
Wrong. What is relevant for the prohibition of the use of force between states and the associated right of self-defense is not the status of a territory under international law, but the existence of a reasonably stable dividing line. De facto rule (Hamas) is sufficient. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/International%20Law/ilpforce.doc
All Note Details