Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-04 21:54:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E63A79D3A55AF787209BB14378416CEE7F476D511D20FAA4199BE4D25084C15B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed rules states that “a practitioner may, where appropriate, provide the court with the correct … preferred gender pronouns”. Whether this rule would apply in the hypothetical lawsuit Rowling mentions is not obvious. https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/south-australia-court-calls-for-use-of-preferred-gender-pronouns/news-story/08cde896d4fbd8fd511a37ea9ae9b99a

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1720901132174676344
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E63A79D3A55AF787209BB14378416CEE7F476D511D20FAA4199BE4D25084C15B
  • createdAtMillis - 1699134862097
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1720901132174676344E63A79D3A55AF787209BB14378416CEE7F476D511D20FAA4199BE4D25084C15B