Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-30 13:03:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F56D476B4A677F93BCA5FDAA6C5E5F7C19F49A722FDA7CAA0AB37A5F0F9C6FA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Regardless the format (ie. question mark at the end of the sentence), the post is a statement that could/should be verified. https://open.lib.umn.edu/goodreasoning/chapter/if-then-arguments/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1718880856230568055
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F56D476B4A677F93BCA5FDAA6C5E5F7C19F49A722FDA7CAA0AB37A5F0F9C6FA
  • createdAtMillis - 1698671030907
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17188808562305680554F56D476B4A677F93BCA5FDAA6C5E5F7C19F49A722FDA7CAA0AB37A5F0F9C6FA