Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-27 05:13:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2362430E2F978C0FF722246E693F3A7DDAEC877324D5E0060415611C306DF791
Participant Details

Original Note:

Eugene Stoner would have been aware of SCOTUS 1939 case U.S. v. Miller- they ruled “military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense.”- 2A covers weapons of war for civilians. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/307/174/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717741077925339321
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2362430E2F978C0FF722246E693F3A7DDAEC877324D5E0060415611C306DF791
  • createdAtMillis - 1698383620845
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17177410779253393212362430E2F978C0FF722246E693F3A7DDAEC877324D5E0060415611C306DF791