Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 20:47:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C91C35E47170E73E20103FFD3F12BEB2331E3E8671E8220F27B4877200A3E45
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note lacks basic reading comprehension, the tweet is saying the opposite of what the CN attributes it to say. Also the proposed note is needlessly argumentative

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717255990330974576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0C91C35E47170E73E20103FFD3F12BEB2331E3E8671E8220F27B4877200A3E45
  • createdAtMillis - 1698266839148
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17172559903309745760C91C35E47170E73E20103FFD3F12BEB2331E3E8671E8220F27B4877200A3E45