Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-25 08:10:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 542173C3EF1B8439184A0F9E6B92D2981E4B837A1A1C1C2F687A5E3AE71CA2EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed, author clearly lays out their evidence. They are not lying, however there are reasonable debates to be had about the meaning of the evidence. Disputed this in the comments, not in CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1717088184905981978
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 542173C3EF1B8439184A0F9E6B92D2981E4B837A1A1C1C2F687A5E3AE71CA2EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1698221431864
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1717088184905981978542173C3EF1B8439184A0F9E6B92D2981E4B837A1A1C1C2F687A5E3AE71CA2EE