Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-23 05:11:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E25CF3BC6DEA730A205B81D3A6AEB4076A3982879CE992041558A0A48A475819
Participant Details

Original Note:

Contrairement à ce qu'affirme ce tweet, Bruno Attal n'a pas "sous-entendu" qu'un viol serait justifié sur cette personne à cause de ses tenues. Il souligne simplement le fait que ces tenues sont inappropriées pour une député. https://twitter.com/Bruno_Attal_/status/1716097234025009460

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1716144017648296168
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E25CF3BC6DEA730A205B81D3A6AEB4076A3982879CE992041558A0A48A475819
  • createdAtMillis - 1698037915288
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1716144017648296168E25CF3BC6DEA730A205B81D3A6AEB4076A3982879CE992041558A0A48A475819