Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-19 12:50:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D461CBE9A871C3F07D87BCDCA95D452D86C025CC4B2822C40055BA8E7E6BCB92
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN La note proposée est de la propagande d’extrême-droite. Lugan n’est pas considéré comme un historien sérieux. Il existe des articles universitaires expliquant pourquoi c’est un révisionniste sur les questions de colonisation. https://journals.openedition.org/chrhc/1273?lang=en

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714368913247457437
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D461CBE9A871C3F07D87BCDCA95D452D86C025CC4B2822C40055BA8E7E6BCB92
  • createdAtMillis - 1697719814766
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1714368913247457437D461CBE9A871C3F07D87BCDCA95D452D86C025CC4B2822C40055BA8E7E6BCB92