Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-21 14:00:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 78509438F00507D1B43D6623607C82AA37F16D7676AE3A4003CA67FD9D9DA131
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN La note proposée est de la propagande d’extrême-droite. Lugan n’est pas considéré comme un historien sérieux. Il existe des articles universitaires expliquant pourquoi c’est un révisionniste sur les questions de colonisation. https://journals.openedition.org/chrhc/1273?lang=en

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1714368913247457437
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 78509438F00507D1B43D6623607C82AA37F16D7676AE3A4003CA67FD9D9DA131
  • createdAtMillis - 1697896847789
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 171436891324745743778509438F00507D1B43D6623607C82AA37F16D7676AE3A4003CA67FD9D9DA131