Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-11 04:52:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F7053F0E9621957023EE2CF079669F6B2BAD26C3BDDC78BB87FDBD87D5F30F0C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This paper has not passed any peer review, it carries a disclaimer that it does not represent the opinions of Statistics Norway (only of the individual authors), none of its authors are climate scientists, and many of the sources it cites have financial ties to fossil fuels. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03046

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1711914824039612897
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F7053F0E9621957023EE2CF079669F6B2BAD26C3BDDC78BB87FDBD87D5F30F0C
  • createdAtMillis - 1696999956532
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1711914824039612897F7053F0E9621957023EE2CF079669F6B2BAD26C3BDDC78BB87FDBD87D5F30F0C