Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-03 06:29:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5836D451ADC47CB4096DF03189C7F5E22E2F7D624ED46C595F1D26D9B0289EB7
Participant Details

Original Note:

This claim is false. The Trump legal team raised an objection based on their interpretation of a prior appellate ruling, but as of Monday evening, the judge "has not dismissed any portion of the attorney general’s case." https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/10/02/trump-fraud-trial-ny-2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1708996592546853192
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5836D451ADC47CB4096DF03189C7F5E22E2F7D624ED46C595F1D26D9B0289EB7
  • createdAtMillis - 1696314574315
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17089965925468531925836D451ADC47CB4096DF03189C7F5E22E2F7D624ED46C595F1D26D9B0289EB7