Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-09 08:32:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 425C270A97CC34EB998AF00682F23564823AE7293B1036F596ADB304C9A56017
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community notes can't be the space to take up criticism of a scientific paper. Partisans may have very strong views about the findings of a paper but they should take those up in replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1699261110862725421
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 425C270A97CC34EB998AF00682F23564823AE7293B1036F596ADB304C9A56017
  • createdAtMillis - 1694248326741
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1699261110862725421425C270A97CC34EB998AF00682F23564823AE7293B1036F596ADB304C9A56017