Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-05 16:52:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DED355E7806F4C0C66836C68279E2CD8E02681A42427428D0F886571AFA8276A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il s’agit clairement d’une plaisanterie, il suffit de regarder les noms. On peut ajouter un contexte pour le grand public mais parler de faux, c’est HS. L’accuser de complotisme par rapport au grand remplacement = opinion ou spéculation. Et wiki n’est pas une source sérieuse.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698960934926966943
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DED355E7806F4C0C66836C68279E2CD8E02681A42427428D0F886571AFA8276A
  • createdAtMillis - 1693932743975
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1698960934926966943DED355E7806F4C0C66836C68279E2CD8E02681A42427428D0F886571AFA8276A