Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-05 12:03:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA93D2815B25BF9B29BBE4A1B8A772DF6E0772C1CC8DC225EA376A3F66552F9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il s’agit clairement d’une plaisanterie, il suffit de regarder les noms. On peut ajouter un contexte pour le grand public mais parler de faux, c’est HS. L’accuser de complotisme par rapport au grand remplacement = opinion ou spéculation. Et wiki n’est pas une source sérieuse.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1698960934926966943
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA93D2815B25BF9B29BBE4A1B8A772DF6E0772C1CC8DC225EA376A3F66552F9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1693915427644
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1698960934926966943CA93D2815B25BF9B29BBE4A1B8A772DF6E0772C1CC8DC225EA376A3F66552F9A