Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-31 11:12:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5600FC6DE14B4094A53C9257FADED163C5C69DFC74C509DF1CC4C0F3D579CD06
Participant Details

Original Note:

O arquivamento mencionado se trata de uma questão processual, o mérito (assunto principal) não chegou sequer a ser julgado pois a competência é do congresso e não da Justiça. https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/articles/cn37z5v89d4o

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1697194476412789029
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5600FC6DE14B4094A53C9257FADED163C5C69DFC74C509DF1CC4C0F3D579CD06
  • createdAtMillis - 1693480377727
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16971944764127890295600FC6DE14B4094A53C9257FADED163C5C69DFC74C509DF1CC4C0F3D579CD06