Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 07:58:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B749660F5ACA8191E48A0E16524C8F26309A4631E70A6D226D6CC1A6CCBE0839
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Obviously the best way to pack 16 squares in a larger square is a regular 4x4 packing, as 16 is a square number. This tweet satirizes square packing problem for some other numbers, which have quite unintuitive solutions or best attempts known so far.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695329352827781255
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B749660F5ACA8191E48A0E16524C8F26309A4631E70A6D226D6CC1A6CCBE0839
  • createdAtMillis - 1693036731604
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695329352827781255B749660F5ACA8191E48A0E16524C8F26309A4631E70A6D226D6CC1A6CCBE0839