Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-23 17:38:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0BB6D846EBBB4C0A46E0B8C1EC5D2A681F07FEFD847865EA24E3780D23AED34D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community Note niet nodig. Hoewel hypocriet gezien de context van wachtgeld en Richard de Mos, gaat het hier om een mening en niet om een inhoudelijke discussie(punt).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1694360313271873574
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0BB6D846EBBB4C0A46E0B8C1EC5D2A681F07FEFD847865EA24E3780D23AED34D
  • createdAtMillis - 1692812285694
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16943603132718735740BB6D846EBBB4C0A46E0B8C1EC5D2A681F07FEFD847865EA24E3780D23AED34D