Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-20 03:03:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 748EF15E59A5E5667545A7893B18B2038D8CE67C7C2E16ABCFC280389B9F8622
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article suggests the man was branded. But in reality, it was the imprint of shoelaces from the encounter https://img.haarets.co.il/bs/0000018a-0d69-d18f-a3fb-1dff65770001/6a/e9/d71b8e3e4faf8b0eb3c6be4ca6fa/policeshoe.jpeg?precrop=832,546,x0,y0&height=672&width=1024

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1693038997612720165
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 748EF15E59A5E5667545A7893B18B2038D8CE67C7C2E16ABCFC280389B9F8622
  • createdAtMillis - 1692500624786
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1693038997612720165748EF15E59A5E5667545A7893B18B2038D8CE67C7C2E16ABCFC280389B9F8622