Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-18 05:35:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0F827AB7329A7251D66ED293C5081B0BAB07D1F8010629487EF1FF6C92EE078
Participant Details

Original Note:

この投稿はまるでマスクの効果がないようにミスリードする内容になっているので注意が必要です 当該のコクランレビューではエビデンスの信頼性が低〜中程度と低くこれだけを持ってマスクの効果に懐疑的な見方をするのは適切ではありません https://www.carenet.com/news/general/carenet/55931 また誤解を招く認識が広がったと編集長も謝罪しています https://news.yahoo.co.jp/expert/articles/c4ae298b82b0e7730cde815bccb240ee2c38310a

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691970526359748769
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0F827AB7329A7251D66ED293C5081B0BAB07D1F8010629487EF1FF6C92EE078
  • createdAtMillis - 1692336903252
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1691970526359748769E0F827AB7329A7251D66ED293C5081B0BAB07D1F8010629487EF1FF6C92EE078