Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-18 12:03:17 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2D4B321E1F97A0497D1C027893C6FC52842FDE08EB5EE590E4D9C1E81008BA96
Participant Details

Original Note:

The AI model did not accurately report the scientific research it was trained on, and produced garbled nonsensical answers. The full article can be read here: https://www.cnet.com/science/meta-trained-an-ai-on-48-million-science-papers-it-was-shut-down-after-two-days/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1691936007934099910
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2D4B321E1F97A0497D1C027893C6FC52842FDE08EB5EE590E4D9C1E81008BA96
  • createdAtMillis - 1692360197760
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16919360079340999102D4B321E1F97A0497D1C027893C6FC52842FDE08EB5EE590E4D9C1E81008BA96