Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-12 05:46:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8D594D623521849817685C62D7E3424C1309108B58857FBB97137957F906B4B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN Les attendus de la décision du Conseil d'État portent suffisamment sur le fond du dossier pour pouvoir prévoir que cette suspension précède l'annulation. La formulation de Sophie Binet est donc un raccourci mais n'est pas une Fake news qui justifierait une note corrective.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1690121963493052886
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8D594D623521849817685C62D7E3424C1309108B58857FBB97137957F906B4B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1691819180349
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16901219634930528868D594D623521849817685C62D7E3424C1309108B58857FBB97137957F906B4B1