Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-10 20:56:37 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A5A2FA8C5E17BE5FEFBE5D6DAF1549D8A763C66926D75BD231ECE139127AAA37
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a misleading tweet. Twitter complied with the search warrant, they were just late in doing so and tried to object to the hush order accompanying the search warrant. The opinion of the Court of Appeals that explains what happened is here: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23903693/redactedopinion.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689471868623863992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A5A2FA8C5E17BE5FEFBE5D6DAF1549D8A763C66926D75BD231ECE139127AAA37
  • createdAtMillis - 1691700997169
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1689471868623863992A5A2FA8C5E17BE5FEFBE5D6DAF1549D8A763C66926D75BD231ECE139127AAA37