Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-06 23:01:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F671CE92AFF73AD0E7A0B0D664AF6A8291F3F2F05C0E5B46C0AA45DF8302ADE9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet uses straightforward and unambiguous language, leaving little room for misinterpretation. The message's intent is evident and doesn't rely on vague or deceptive wording.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1688321230724616344
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F671CE92AFF73AD0E7A0B0D664AF6A8291F3F2F05C0E5B46C0AA45DF8302ADE9
  • createdAtMillis - 1691362864329
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1688321230724616344F671CE92AFF73AD0E7A0B0D664AF6A8291F3F2F05C0E5B46C0AA45DF8302ADE9