Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-05 04:29:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF0A8C636954CB69311987818EE46245CF062C4BCA64702026BD34BC43877B5E
Participant Details

Original Note:

最高裁判決は誤りである。 実際は民事、高裁での二審判決。 原告はジャニーズ、被告は文春であり原告の勝訴。文春側は支払い命令を受けている。 https://www.ben54.jp/news/383

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1687649744867529083
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF0A8C636954CB69311987818EE46245CF062C4BCA64702026BD34BC43877B5E
  • createdAtMillis - 1691209749828
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1687649744867529083EF0A8C636954CB69311987818EE46245CF062C4BCA64702026BD34BC43877B5E