Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-28 19:19:20 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DACF4A8DFDE262EE2E445650E11EB73D8B6D15F9CB0AA0A43623FFCB0CA01650
Participant Details

Original Note:

La décision du Conseil constitutionnel n'a pas dit cela¹. Eu égard à l'impossibilité d'expliquer ce en quoi le Tweet est trompeur en 280 caractères, voici des explications détaillées par des juristes (dont un avocat) : https://twitter.com/Maitre_Eolas/status/1684898925050753024?t=0s1eT6LvFZI6G8fEQPlEEw&s=19 https://twitter.com/Pierre_B_y/status/1684943010541207553?t=0s1eT6LvFZI6G8fEQPlEEw&s=19 ¹ : https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/decision/2023/2023853DC.htm (§66 à 78)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1684954515756253185
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DACF4A8DFDE262EE2E445650E11EB73D8B6D15F9CB0AA0A43623FFCB0CA01650
  • createdAtMillis - 1690571960033
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1684954515756253185DACF4A8DFDE262EE2E445650E11EB73D8B6D15F9CB0AA0A43623FFCB0CA01650