Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-21 01:47:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 616160B6E854B81EB11DEF9FAB6E6A6FB1640DBF7F5196235EF299F31683BCA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

特定事項の科学的根拠を厚生労働省に求めてもそのような「行政文書」は存在しないと回答されるのは当然である。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1682031930307678214
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 616160B6E854B81EB11DEF9FAB6E6A6FB1640DBF7F5196235EF299F31683BCA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1689904029422
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1682031930307678214616160B6E854B81EB11DEF9FAB6E6A6FB1640DBF7F5196235EF299F31683BCA3