Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-03 23:22:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B9B4CCA99835B1EC62E06CA4C757C3A3EACE0FB0C95A9AFCB585C2DFC5E24B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note states there is no hard evidence of fraud, but fails to note that there is no evidence that proves definitively that there was no fraud. That leaves this tweet in the realm of opinion, and does not need a note

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1681457896490696711
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B9B4CCA99835B1EC62E06CA4C757C3A3EACE0FB0C95A9AFCB585C2DFC5E24B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1691104924665
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16814578964906967119B9B4CCA99835B1EC62E06CA4C757C3A3EACE0FB0C95A9AFCB585C2DFC5E24B3