Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-09 03:00:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AA962161EC38C3C0A7318CA643B66BAF563963E4373D73D3D629EB9C25A104C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The “review” spends more time critiquing the subject matter and claims made in the film than it does talking about the film itself. None the less, it is all opinion. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677838747277090816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AA962161EC38C3C0A7318CA643B66BAF563963E4373D73D3D629EB9C25A104C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1688871635075
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1677838747277090816AA962161EC38C3C0A7318CA643B66BAF563963E4373D73D3D629EB9C25A104C5