Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-09 02:35:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 814C83A41EF2E7636F21514CBF412563D38AAC45E2B296345C52343D6A769C6C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The “review” spends more time critiquing the subject matter and claims made in the film than it does talking about the film itself. None the less, it is all opinion. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677838747277090816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 814C83A41EF2E7636F21514CBF412563D38AAC45E2B296345C52343D6A769C6C
  • createdAtMillis - 1688870128823
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1677838747277090816814C83A41EF2E7636F21514CBF412563D38AAC45E2B296345C52343D6A769C6C