Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-09 01:45:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FE310869DB3D5C19A1BC56F37C22706AEAC8BA2C9F145E081D2097984ED8DA6D
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's a fair shorthand to say that they won after being pursued through the courts and the court case being dismissed for being without standing. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Mermaids-v-Charity-Commission-judgment-060723.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676961365242822658
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FE310869DB3D5C19A1BC56F37C22706AEAC8BA2C9F145E081D2097984ED8DA6D
  • createdAtMillis - 1688867122012
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1676961365242822658FE310869DB3D5C19A1BC56F37C22706AEAC8BA2C9F145E081D2097984ED8DA6D