Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-04 03:25:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD10D60CC416C800650CFF7419E62F262F8CBF326D9443DF02FA18716D3C3A7A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This alleged request from "Stewart" was not mentioned in the SCOTUS opinion because it had no bearing on the outcome of the case. The issue of the plaintiff's legal standing was not in dispute in this case, which is why the dissent doesn't mention it. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676069505724981248
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD10D60CC416C800650CFF7419E62F262F8CBF326D9443DF02FA18716D3C3A7A
  • createdAtMillis - 1688441154827
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1676069505724981248DD10D60CC416C800650CFF7419E62F262F8CBF326D9443DF02FA18716D3C3A7A