Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-04 05:34:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0F22003D157133EE982BC5803B4EB1C2F1D59C8A3D3DD9592EBA459776FF77D
Participant Details

Original Note:

This alleged request from "Stewart" was not mentioned in the SCOTUS opinion because it had no bearing on the outcome of the case. The issue of the plaintiff's legal standing was not in dispute in this case, which is why the dissent doesn't mention it. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676069505724981248
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0F22003D157133EE982BC5803B4EB1C2F1D59C8A3D3DD9592EBA459776FF77D
  • createdAtMillis - 1688448872303
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1676069505724981248B0F22003D157133EE982BC5803B4EB1C2F1D59C8A3D3DD9592EBA459776FF77D