Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-05 17:23:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7DF4E637E6D9F1AF088866E224A1AD38D7505DCD79C730D4E20F7511937F2026
Participant Details

Original Note:

This alleged request from "Stewart" was not mentioned in the SCOTUS opinion because it had no bearing on the outcome of the case. The issue of the plaintiff's legal standing was not in dispute in this case, which is why the dissent doesn't mention it. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676069505724981248
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7DF4E637E6D9F1AF088866E224A1AD38D7505DCD79C730D4E20F7511937F2026
  • createdAtMillis - 1688577816893
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16760695057249812487DF4E637E6D9F1AF088866E224A1AD38D7505DCD79C730D4E20F7511937F2026