Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-01 02:08:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 384A9C1F73149B42335C849B53C70C0FF6E97366631914DF7A41047700E3B1F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

False. As stated in the Court's opinion, a state "may 'protect gay persons . . . in acquiring whatever products and services they choose on the same terms and conditions as are offered to other[s] . . . .'" But, it may not force someone to speak in favor of homosexual unions. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1674814139259076612
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 384A9C1F73149B42335C849B53C70C0FF6E97366631914DF7A41047700E3B1F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1688177321830
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1674814139259076612384A9C1F73149B42335C849B53C70C0FF6E97366631914DF7A41047700E3B1F6