Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-27 21:19:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E5251A59C6E5EFDDBF1F4606EB6FD3F6DADB46FA1ACD6D1DCB0108D34D3BAA5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes saying “no evidence” are confusing absence of evidence with evidence of absence. Such appeals to ignorance are a type of logical fallacy - the burden of proof is on Community Notes to produce evidence to the contrary. Without this, a note is only speculation. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1673781712525070336
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E5251A59C6E5EFDDBF1F4606EB6FD3F6DADB46FA1ACD6D1DCB0108D34D3BAA5F
  • createdAtMillis - 1687900784900
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1673781712525070336E5251A59C6E5EFDDBF1F4606EB6FD3F6DADB46FA1ACD6D1DCB0108D34D3BAA5F